Biodiversity loss and ecosystem stability: A zoological review
pdf

Keywords

zoological review
pollinator networks
food web stability
animal diversity
functional redundancy
portfolio effect
insurance effect
functional diversity
ecosystem stability
biodiversity-stability relationship

How to Cite

Biodiversity loss and ecosystem stability: A zoological review. (2025). Zoological Records and Reviews, 5(1), 25-32. http://zoologicalrecords.com/index.php/ZRR/article/view/113

Abstract

The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem stability has been one of the most actively researched questions in
ecology for three decades, with major theoretical and empirical advances generating a nuanced but increasingly
convergent understanding that higher biodiversity consistently confers greater ecosystem stability across multiple
dimensions and scales. This review synthesises evidence specifically from zoological systems -- focusing on animal
diversity as both a driver and indicator of ecosystem stability -- across 196 primary studies and six major meta-analyses
published between 1994 and 2024. We examine four stability dimensions (resistance, resilience, temporal variability, and
recovery rate) across three animal-dominated ecosystem types (predator-prey food webs, pollinator-plant networks, and
detritivore-mediated nutrient cycling). Meta-analysis of 84 studies confirms that higher animal diversity reduces temporal
variability of community-level productivity by a mean of 38.4% (portfolio effect and functional redundancy mechanisms),
increases resistance to disturbance by 28.4% (insurance effects), and improves post-disturbance recovery rates by
44.8% (functional complementarity in recolonisation). The biodiversity-stability relationship is strongest for functional
diversity relative to taxonomic diversity (mean standardised effect size 0.84 vs. 0.62 respectively) and is significantly
moderated by the identity of functionally unique species: the loss of a single functionally unique animal species reduced
multi-metric stability indices by 24.4 +- 6.8% in experimental systems -- a disproportionate effect far exceeding expected
proportional contributions. These findings reaffirm the conservation-ecology nexus: preserving animal diversity is not
merely an ethical obligation but an ecological necessity for maintaining ecosystem stability and the services that depend
on it.

pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.